The unspoken powers of our President . . . . .
The Executive Order
applicable especially in a financial emergency :
from >>>> http://dmc.members.sonic.net/s…
A Presidential Executive Order, whether Constitutional or not, becomes law simply by its publication in the Federal Registry. Congress is by-passed. Here are just a few Executive Orders that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen:
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
OK , Republicans . . . . yield or be demolished .
Regarding ‘space-time’
‘Space-time’ (compliments of Albert Einstein) is much more than (quote) “a mathematical method to express the behavior of space relative to motion.” (end quote).
We ‘measure’ space and time BUT the measurements ARE NOT THE THINGS THEMSELVES. ‘Space-time’ is the ‘thing’ unto itself and not the measurements thereof. The ‘measurements’ have the same name but are NOT ultimate ‘space-time’…. but are ‘relative’ space-time increments.
Space-time includes mathematical methods but those mathematical methods are a ‘sub-set’ of space-time but are not ‘space-time’, in and of themselves.
When Einstein spoke of ‘space-time’ he was not referring, exclusively, to the measureable quantities (increments) of space-time. Einstein was referring to the two (space and time) constituent components that make up the fabric of the universe. Einstein’s observations / conclusions in this matter are highly abstract and transcend any measureable component of ‘space-time’.
To Einstein (interpreted) ‘space-time’ is the ‘abstract entity’.
In other words, after you examine a phenomena and then subtract out (abstract) everything extractable then what you have left (ultimately) is ‘space-time’.
‘Space-time’ is all that remains at the very outer edge of one’s rational mind….. space-time as a pure abstraction.
‘Space-time’ is the last stop before we get to ‘nothing’…. as in ‘absolute nothing’. ‘Absolute nothing’ cannot be defined because ‘absolute nothing’ has no defining characteristics. (This is very abstract). It is NOT the absence of something… it is beyond ‘absence’….. our minds cannot go there…… because our rational mind need ‘things’ (some thing) in order to operate. The best that we can do, regarding ‘nothing’ is a ‘relative’ nothing.
So, according to Einstein (interpreted), space-time is the ‘entity’ that first appears and remains, regardless of the multifarious measureable configurations that take place within ‘space-time’.
Ultimately, neither ‘space’ nor ‘time’ can be abstracted from ‘space-time’; space-time is an indivisible ‘unity’. One may also refer to this ‘indivisible unity’ as ‘the ether’ but that name (‘ether’) is just another term for ‘space-time’.
Our minds will not allow us to subtract out either ‘space’ or ‘time’ from ‘space-time’…. ‘Space-time’ is ‘ground zero’ for all phenomena.
The ‘observer’ of ‘space-time’ has his or her existence within space-time. To attempt to remove either space or time is to terminate the existence of the observer. ‘Non-existence’ is the closest we can come to a definition of ‘absolute nothing’. …. nothing ‘nameable’.
If we have a red dress and extract out the dress then what we have left is ‘red’. If we eliminate ‘red’ that what is left is space-time.
This is the ‘place/point’ beyond which we cannot go (space-time).
As such there is a fundamental difference between space and time as measurements of space and time. When we extract out the measurements then all that remains is space-time as an abstract entity.
‘Space and time’ as ‘measurements’ misses the point. The measurements of space and time take place within space-time. When the measurements cease we still have space-time but they are not ‘quantifiable’. In much the same way that ‘time’ is contained in ‘eternity’ which also is non-quantifiable’.
So, ‘pure eternity’ is without ‘time’ just as ‘space-time’, in its purest expression, is without comprehensive (all inclusive) measurement.
Repeat: If there is any difficulty is grasping this it is because our minds cannot go there…. even in abstraction.
Welcome to ‘Einstein-ville’.
I have formulated a theory addressing this issue.
The theory is called “The Displacement Theory of Gravity”©
It is based upon the hypothesis that we do not, as yet, understand fully, the nature of ‘space’.
“The Displacement Theory of Gravity” © states that objects do NOT occupy space but, rather, objects ‘displace’ space.
As such, ‘space’ is not ‘an empty distance’ but, is rather, a ‘fabric’.
When ‘matter’ is introduced into ‘space’, the ‘space’ is ‘displaced’ and stretched by the presence of matter. It (the matter) warps the nearby space and the ‘warp’ of space (space/time) is actually what gravity is (as compared to what gravity ‘does’).
So… ‘gravity’, according to the theory, is the result of the manipulation of space (space/time) and that manipulation creates the ‘apparent’ attracting force. How-so-ever, it also creates an ‘apparent’ repelling force.
Here’s how…. the ‘space’ near matter is stretched (creating an apparent attracting force – a rock ‘falls’ to the ground) and the space between objects is compressed (creating an ‘apparent’ repelling force determined by relative mass).
All matter, like a ‘blackhole’, has an ‘event horizon’. The ‘event horizon’ is the line where ‘space’ changes from being ‘stretched’ to where it is ‘compressed’. The ‘space’ within the Earth’s atmosphere is ‘stretched’ and the ‘space’ between the Earth and the Moon is ‘compressed.
So, gravity, according to the theory, is both an apparent ‘attracting’ and ‘apparent ‘repelling’ force….. depending upon which side of the event horizon we are on.
This leaves (in my thinking) one unanswered question (how ridiculously pretentious!).
The ‘question’ is that ‘gravity’ is dependent upon ‘mass’ (density of matter) and not ‘area/volume’. So a brick would produce greater gravity that an inflated baloon, despite the fact that the baloon covers a greater area of space. Why is this?
The only reasonable answer is ‘atomic density’.
We know that atoms are mostly ‘space’…. as such, on a quantum level, ‘space’ is inherent in atoms….. when matter has a greater density (mass) the gravitational effect is magnified…. so… rushing to an extreme… we have a teaspoon full of ‘blackhole’ matter with a near-infinite density… and it warps nearby ‘space’…. then why is the ‘warp’ dependent upon ‘mass’?
Answer (hypothesis): There is a property of ‘space’ that we do not, as yet, understand (or have not, as yet detected).
Einstein linked space with time as an inseparable ‘unity’…… the general rule is that ‘time’ is always ‘flowing’ (from present to future), so, perhaps, space is also ‘always flowing’ and the ‘flow’ of space is constricted by the presence of matter and the greater the density of that matter the greater the restriction to the ‘flow’ of ‘space-time’, resulting in increased gravity. …. the ‘space-time’ is still ‘flowing’ but is ‘flowing’ at a slower rate (compared to the normal flow (?) when matter is not present).
The extreme end of the flow of ‘space-time’ is within a blackhole wherein both space and time ‘stop’ and infinite gravity and infinite mass are present.
Anyhow.. that is the theory…… ‘space’ is a ‘fabric’ and not just an ‘empty’ distance and the presence of matter ‘displaces’ space/time and ‘gravity’ is one of the results (as stated above).